What Jargon Annoys You?

Legal and HR Jargon

What Jargon Annoys You?

Let’s face it, we all have pet hates when it comes to jargon and terminology.  Lawyers use it all the time, and it is usually a big gripe that lawyers write in a style of language which is hard to understand. We’ve all come across Legal and HR Jargon too often.

Actually, that is less true these days than it used to be.  Most lawyers I know are now careful to write correspondence to clients in plain English, and try to explain difficult concepts in language their clients will understand.  But when it comes to legal documents, all too often lawyers go back to archaic and old-fashioned legalese, full of long sentences replete with double negatives.  If you have tried to read a property Lease, you will know what I mean.

The great thing is that it is easy to blame the Americans for some of our horrible terminology.  In my field of employment law, the term “human resources” has sadly taken hold (although thankfully it is made somewhat more palatable by the generic term “HR”).  But we just need to think of terms like “Chief Executive Officer”, “President” and “Vice President”, “reach out”, “core competency”, “going forwards”, “buy-in”, “empower”, “blue-sky thinking”.  Ugh.

Another one of my pet hate terms is “Corporate Social Responsibility”.  This is the whole area devoted to making companies look like they have a conscience and care about society at large (rather than just profit, shareholders and directors’ bonuses).  But Corporate Social Responsibility sounds like you are trying too hard to be good, the focus being on the `corporate’ element rather than `social responsibility’.  Could we not come up with something better – how about “What We Do to Help Others”?

That said, it is only a term of language and really I should get over it.   Lots of companies do many good activities and try to benefit society at large, and so what if they get a bit of good PR and kudos out of it?

LEJOG

And on that note, I am joining in the Corporate Social Responsibility activity of none other than Deloitte.  They organise an annual Ride Across Britain challenge, and I will be cycling from Lands End to John O’Groats in a 9 day haul this September, with approximately 1000 other cyclists.

It is going to be tough, but I’m thoroughly looking forward to it and have – temporarily – embraced the MAMIL fraternity.  But the important ‘social responsibility’ bit is that most of us will be raising money for various charities, and I am pleased that I will be raising money for the MS Society.

If you would like to donate to my justgiving page you can do so here.

And if I and many others can raise a decent amount of money for good causes, I’ll happily put up with any amount of jargon.

(c) Ben Thornber, Thornber HR Law

 

 

 

Strong and Stable or Weak and Wobbly?

Strong and Stable, or Weak and Wobbly?

The General Election and Employment Law

In the aftermath of the awful Manchester bombing, it is hard to refocus on the General Election campaign.  It does not help that the level of debate does not get much above slogans of Strong and Stable or Weak and Wobbly.  And with only just over a week to go,  we can expect more slogans coming at us from all sides. But what about Employment Law?

For once, though, the two main parties are making a noise about some important employment matters.  And what is disorientating is that they seem to be vying for who can be more worker friendly. Check out their manifestos here

For starters, pay (which in my view is the most important employment right) will increase: the Conservatives will raise the Living Wage in line with average earnings until 2022; Labour will raise it immediately to £10/hour.  Then, both sides say they will extend workers’ rights to those in the `Gig Economy’.  Don’t forget though, that this will be used as an excuse to raise tax through National Insurance payments (remember the Budget U-turn?).

Brexit rears its head in the form of EU nationals living here: Labour will guarantee their rights immediately; the Conservatives will almost certainly do the same but want a reciprocal guarantee for UK nationals living in the UE.  All existing EU employment laws will be guaranteed by both sides (for now, at least).  And interestingly, both parties pledge to have some form of worker representation on Company boards.

What the parties are promising

But from here the parties go in different directions.  In a sharp but expected turn to the left, Labour has made some big announcements such as abolishing fees for employment tribunals, banning zero-hour contracts, and bolstering collective bargaining.  The SNP have said much the same.  No prizes for guessing that the Conservatives will not go down these lines.

For their part, the Tories say shorter-term mental health conditions will be classed as `disability’ under the Equality Act, will give workers the right to take unpaid time off to care for dependents, and will charge businesses for hiring migrant workers.

So what to make of it all?  The big picture is that the only game in town is extending workers’ rights, with the differences being about how far the parties will go.   This is in contrast to the old left/right arguments about the role of unions and state intervention in the employment market, and is in my view all the better for it.

What I can confidently predict, however, is that whichever party wins the election, the Government of the day will have plenty of wobbles along the way.  Bit like us, really.  But no need for you to worry, no matter the outcome, we keep on top of all the Employment Law matters so you can relax.  Contact us today for reassurance.

(c) Ben Thornber, Thornber HR Law

What makes you happy at work?

What makes you happy at work?

Genuine question.  Not easy to answer though.  But businesses need to keep asking this question of their workforce to help ensure they recruit and keep the best staff.  And we all need to question this ourselves to make sure we are in the right place at work.

There are a number of basic “happiness” factors such as pay and benefits, how much of the intrinsic nature of work itself we find enjoyable, how much boring “office admin” takes up of our time (less is more).  But to a large extent these factors are determined by the type of industry or work we have chosen to do; the constraints are inherent in the role and company.

There is also a large push within companies to introduce “well-being” schemes.  These range from encouraging flexible working, designing ergonomic workspaces, supplying healthy foods and drinks, or encouraging more physical activity with cycling schemes and subsidised gym membership.  They all help to create a healthy working environment, which in turn encourages staff to stay and feel motivated.

Other areas which play a part are corporate values and corporate social responsibility.  This will help determine whether, at an instinctive level, we feel comfortable working for a company or whether we want to look elsewhere.

But when it comes to happiness at work, most people ask themselves more fundamental questions:

  • Am I respected and listened to?
  • Do I have control (within reason) over when and how I do my work?
  • Do I feel valued?
  • If I do a good job, will I have an opportunity to progress?

Only when you answer “yes” to these questions will you feel happy at work.  Or to put it another way, I defy anyone to consider themselves happy at work if they are not respected and do not feel valued.  Even if they are paid a shed load of money.

So, the key for companies and managers is to ensure that they do respect, listen, give control to and value team members and direct reports.  Not easy, because if it was we would all be doing it.

But here is one method everyone can try.  For your 1-2-1 review meetings with team members (preferably outside the office, over coffee), ask how they see their successes and what they have done well.  Keep it positive, and don’t let them dwell on what they see as the bad bits.

Then ask them what they would like to improve, how they and the team could do better.  Thank them for their thoughts.  And then next time: review, give feedback and repeat.  Consistently.

If we all did this, would we not feel happier at work?

(c) Ben Thornber, Thornber HR Law

Contact Thornber Employment Law

If you want a free discussion on the issues in this article or on any other employment law or HR issue, give Ben a call on 01383 272 000 or fill out our online enquiry form to arrange your free initial discussion.

Discrimination? Never! A success story from one of Scotland’s popular destinations.

Discrimination? Never! A success story from one of Scotland’s popular destinations.

We can all think of companies who take advantage of lower paid workers who are often women, and where women struggle to get balance work and family life, are paid less or do not get promoted to senior positions. I for one get a lot of enquiries about all sorts of subtle and not so subtle discrimination issues, many of them which are justified.

But it is heartening to know that there are many companies out there who do quite the opposite. They promote women to senior positions, give flexibility around their child care, maternity and other family commitments, and generally look after all their staff in a caring way.

One of my clients does just this: Loch Leven’s Larder www.lochlevenslarder.com. Their story is that Robin and Emma Niven were vegetable farmers, but had become frustrated at the lack of locally grown produce available in the local shops. Raising a young family, they also felt that there was a lack of family-friendly venues in the local area serving healthy, quality food.

In 2005 they decided to start selling the food they grow directly to local customers and offering them a chance to taste it from their café. They are now a multi award-winning dining and retail destination, and people flock to their restaurant café and shop from all across Scotland.

Their family-friendly ethos is not just about customers though. Emma employs many working mothers and starts from their point of view of what they need to balance work and family: flexibility is a given. She believes in promoting on merit and it so happens that her senior team is now mainly women. There are also excellent partnerships with local schools, and many of the younger local workforce have worked there during the holidays or at weekends/evenings. They also support local charities, for example by paying the 5p plastic bag levy themselves to donate to a local hospice (Rachel House).

Loch Leven’s Larder is not alone. There are many other companies out there with excellent values, focussed on the local community and understanding of their workforce. Not a discriminatory thought in sight. Let’s have more of them please.

(c) Ben Thornber, Thornber HR Law

From Lithuania to the Sheraton

From Lithuania to the Sheraton

(Article also published on 22 December 2016 in Scotlandb2b)

Irrespective of your views about Brexit and EU migration to the UK, it’s too easy to forget that people coming to live and work in this country they have their own personal stories.  So it was a pleasure to learn about one uplifting story which a client – No 11 Hotel & Brasserie on Brunswick St, Edinburgh – has about one of its employees.

Hailing from Lithuania, Peter started working for the Hotel as a night porter in 2013.  At the time he was notionally at College, but he dropped out and went off the rails for a while.  At this point most employers would have said goodbye, but the owners of the Hotel, Hamish and Susan Grant, were willing to give him a second chance.

They recognised he was bright, quick to learn and good with customers, and so gave Peter a role as a waiter where he could spend more time with clients and an opportunity to learn more skills.  They also helped with discussions with the College which supported Peter through the difficult period.

Peter quickly got to grips with waiting tables.  Seeing that he was beginning to sort his life out and grab the opportunity given to him, the Hotel owners gave Peter more responsibility as Shift Supervisor.  Then in spring 2015 an opportunity came up to become acting Restaurant Manager, and he stepped up to the task.

Having gained renewed confidence in his abilities, Peter wanted to study for a degree in hotel management.  The Hotel were more than accommodating by offering him flexible hours so that he could attend the course and pursue his University studies.

All this hard work and good faith has resulted in Peter having recently landed a management role with the Sheraton Hotel in Edinburgh whilst continuing with his degree.

For their part, the Hotel owners are delighted that Peter has taken the opportunity to get back on track with his life and is fulfilling his potential.

It is refreshing to see an employer take this kind of enlightened approach.   It would have been all too easy to give up on Peter, with many others available to take his place.  But they saw his potential, gave him the opportunity and made the investment.  Rather than begrudge that he has moved on, the Hotel owners have the pleasure and satisfaction of seeing an employee grow and develop.

An enlightened employer helping an employee turn their life around? – let’s have more of those stories please, no matter what country they are from.  And – to get back to the EU debate –  not only do employers in the hospitality trade wonder where their staff will come from with the lack of applications from UK nationals, let’s not forget that closing the door on people like Peter means the same door will be shut on our own young people in other EU countries.  Now that would be a shame.

(c) Ben Thornber, Thornber HR Law